SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Cal) 262

SUBHAS CHANDRA SEN, BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
WOOD CRAFT PRODUCTS LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.C.PRASAD, R.K.Murarka

SUHAS CHANDRA SEN, J.

( 1 ) THE Tribunal has referred the following questions of law under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to this court :

( 2 ) R. A. No. 916/ (Cal) of 1986 : "whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in upholding the disallowance of the claim under Section 80g of the Income-tax Act, 1961, in respect of the donation of Rs. 1,50,000 given to Vishwa Mangal Trust ?

( 3 ) R. A. No. 962/ (Cal) of 1986 : (1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in deleting the dis-allowance of Rs. 7,500 representing the statutory fee paid in connection with the application to raise the authorised share capital and Rs. 500 representing the application fee paid for issue of bonus shares by holding that the said expenses were not capital expenditure ? (2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 14,467 being export subsidy and duty drawback accrued to the assessee in the previous year but not shown in the profit and loss account?"

( 4 ) IN this procee








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top