SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Cal) 128

MONORANJAN MALLICK
TAPAN RAKSHIT – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF JUSTICE, High COURT, CALCUTTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALOK GHOSH, BIKASH RANJAN NEOGI, TAPAN SARKAR

M. R. MALLICK, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner who is an ex-military personnel was appointed as Court Keeper, High Court, Calcutta on a temporary basis on 5. 7. 1988 until further orders with effect from 5. 7. 1988 in place of D. G. Penn Anthany who retired with effect from 4. 7. 1988.

( 2 ) IN or about 17. 6. 1989 by a Memo. being No. 4938-GS the Deputy Registrar, Appellate Side, High Court, Calcutta issued a show cause notice directing the petitioner to submit show cause within 7 days alleging, inter alia, that the petitioner were not found in the quarter during the period of leave and that such act amounts to negligence of duty and breach of office discipline since the petitioner has been provided with the residential quarters in the court premises to stay there and to meet any emergency that may arise in the day and night.

( 3 ) ON. the very day by another Memo being No. 4939-GS the same Deputy Registrar, Appellate Side, High Court, Calcutta issued another show cause notice directing, inter alia, to show cause against the allegations that the petitioner was directed on 14. 6. 1989 by the Registrar, Appellate Side, High Court, Calcutta to attend Howrah Station at 6 a. m. on 15. 6. 19























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top