SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Cal) 130

SUBHAS CHANDRA SEN, BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
DEWAS SYNTHETICS (P. ) LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.M.DHAR, RAMCHANDRA PRASAD

BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE J.

( 1 ) THE Tribunal has referred to this court the following question of law under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ("the Act") :"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and on a correct interpretation of Section 43 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal was right in holding that a sum of Rs. 11,22,102 received by the assessee as subsidy under the 'central Outright Grant or Subsidy Scheme, 1971,' should not be deducted from the cost of the capital assets mainly plant and machinery and factory building ?"

( 2 ) THE assessment year involved is 1980-81 for which the relevant accounting year ended on June 30, 1979.

( 3 ) THE facts of this case, as is evident from the statement of case, are as follows :"the assessee is a private limited company. It derives income from the business in the manufacture and sale of raw silk fabrics. The assessment year involved in this reference is 1980-81, the relevant previous year was the year ending June 30, 1979. Under the Central Outright Grant or Subsidy Scheme, 1971, introduced by the Central Government and implemented by different State Governments, the assessee received certain sum


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top