High Court Of Calcutta
A. M. BHATTACHARJEE, KALYANMOY GANGULI, GANGULY, Amulya Kumar Nandi
ANJAN CHOUDHURY - Appellant
Versus
ANANDANEER CO-OPERATIVE REGISTEREDHOUSING SOCIETY - Respondent
C. R. 1173 Of 1984
Decided On : 03/28/1990
CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES - DISPUTES - JURISDICTION - CIVIL COURT - COGNIZANCE - DISPUTES RELATING TO THE AFFAIRS OF A CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY - DEFINITION - INTERPRETATION - SECTION 95 (1) OF THE WEST BENGAL CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1983 - SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY - DISTINCTION BETWEEN "BUSINESS" AND "AFFAIRS" - CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY - TENANCY DISPUTES - JURISDICTION OF THE REGISTRAR - SECTION 134 (2) (D) OF THE ACT - APPLICABILITY - LIMITATION - SECTION 14 OF THE LIMITATION ACT - APPLICABILITY TO REFERENCE OF DISPUTE TO REGISTRAR.
Fact of the Case:
The dispute involved in the suit, giving rise to this revision, is a dispute of which cognizance cannot be taken by a Civil Court because of the provisions of section 134 (2) (d) of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 and the same is required to be referred to the Registrar under section 95 (1) thereof.
Finding of the Court:
The Court below was accordingly wrong in entertaining the suit and in holding that it had jurisdiction and that the plaint was not liable to be rejected under the provisions of Order 7, Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure and that the Court had jurisdiction to proceed with the suit.
Issues: Whether the dispute involved in the suit, giving rise to this revision, is a dispute of which cognizance cannot be taken by a Civil Court because of the provisions of section 134 (2) (d) of the Co-operative Societies Act, 1983 and the same is required to be referred to the Registrar under section 95 (1) thereof.
Ratio Decidendi: The expression "dispute" in the context of these sections, would go out of the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts because of section 132 (2) of the Old and section 134 (2) of the New Act. The expression "dispute" has been defined in section 2 (20) of the New Act as "any matter capable of being the subject of civil litigation, and includes a claim in response of any sum payable to or by a Co-operative Society". Any "dispute" required to be referred to the Registrar under section 86 (1) of the Old or section 95 (1) of the New Act, would go out of the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts because of section 132 (2) of the Old and section 134 (2) of the New Act. The expressions "concerning" and "relating and the expressions "business"' and "affairs" may sound synonymous and reference to the Lexicon may also go to support such an impression. Tautology again? We do not think so. Any thing concerning the business of a Co-operative Society is a matter relating to the affairs of the Society. But everything relating to the affairs of the Society may not be concerning the business of that Society.
Final Decision: Rule made absolute, set aside the impugned order of the Court below holding the suit to be maintainable and dismissing the application for rejection of the plaint and direct that the plaint shall stand rejected.
( 1 ) ON a reference being made by a Division Bench of this Court, the present rule has been referred to this larger Bench for disposal as according to the referring Bench, the "same involves "a very important question" decision whereon "may lead to far-reaching consequences".
( 2 ) UNDER section 86 (1) of the West Bengal Co-operative Societies Act, 1973 "any dispute relating to the affairs of a Co-operative Society" was required to be referred to the Registrar if the parties thereto were as specified in clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d) to that sub-section and under section 1312 (2) (d) of the said Act, no Civil Court would have any jurisdiction in respect of "any dispute required under section 86 to be referred to the Registrar". The important question, according to the order of reference, is what were the disputes that were required to be so referred to the Registrar under section 86 (1) (d) and were accordingly not justiciable in a Civil Court and, the Rule in its entirety having been referred to this Bench for disposal, the further consequential question is whether the dispute involved in the Civil Suit, giving rise to this revisional application, is such a dispute.
( 3 ) WHEN the order of reference was made in 1985, the Act of 1973 was still in operation and the present Act of 1983, which has replaced the Act of 1973, was yet to come into force which has thereafter come into force with effect from 1st August, 1987. Section 3 of the Act of 1983, while repealing the earlier Act of 1973, has provided in sub-section (2) that "anything done or suffered or action taken (including any suit or proceeding commenced, any dispute decided, any right or title accrued, or any liability or obligation or penalty incurred)" while the preceding Act was in operation, "shall be deemed to have been done or suffered or taken under this Act, as if the provisions of this Act were in force at all material times when such thing was done or suffered or such action was taken". As a result, since the repeal and replacement of the Act of 1973 by the Act of 1983 in 1987, the law to be considered for the present proceeding, including the suit that has given rise to it, is that contained in the new Act of 1983 and we propose to dispose of this Revision with reference to the provisions of the present Act. Be it, however, noted that the relevant provisions material for our present purpose of the Act of 1973 and the Act of 1983 are almost in pari materia. The relevant provisions are sections 86 (1) and 132 (2) of the Act of 1973, now repealed, and sections 95 (1) and 134 (2) of the present Act of 1983 and the material portions thereof are reproduced herein below :-act XXXVIII of 1973 :-"86 ( 1) Any dispute relating to the affairs of a Co-operative Society or of the liquidator of a society shall be referred to the Registrar if the parties, thereto are among the following, namely :- (a)the society, its managing committee, any past or present officer, agent or employee or the liquidator of the society; or (b)a member, past member or person claiming through a member, past member or deceased member of the society; or (c)a surety of a member, past member or deceased member the society, whether such surety is or is not a member of the society; or (d) any other co-operative society or any person (including financing bank) having transactions with the concerned cooperative Society or the liquidator of such society". "132 (2) Save as provided in this Act, no Civil or Revenue Court shall have any jurisdiction in respect of - (d) any dispute required under section 86 be referred to the Registrar. "
( 4 ) ACT XIV of 1983 :-"95 (1) Any dispute concerning the business of a co-operative society capable of being the subject of civil litigation or any dispute relating to the affairs of a co-operative society ( other than a dispute relating to the disciplinary action taken by a co-operative society against the paid employees of the co-operative society
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.