SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Cal) 408

A.K.SENGUPTA, BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
CAMELLIA TEA GROUP PVT LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.P.BANERJI, S.K.MITRA

AJIT K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1081-82, the following question of law has been referred to this court :"whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the hail damage insurance claim receivable by the assessee-company in the amount of Rs. 3,13,410 was a mixed receipt to which Rule 8 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, is applicable ?"

( 2 ) SHORTLY stated, the facts are that from the director's report dated December 2, 1980, the Income-tax Officer found that, in this year, insurance claim receivable under hail damage insurance policy on account of severe hailstorm amounted to Rs. 3,13,410. There was a severe hailstorm in Darjeeling area on April 17, 1980, as a result of which the tea crop in the assessee's gardens was damaged. The assessee, on April 18, 1980, intimated the damage caused to the crop by the hailstorm to the insurance company, namely, Messrs. National Insurance (P.) Ltd. The insurance company admitted the claim of the assessee to the tune of Rs. 3,13,410. Before the Income-tax Officer, this amount was claimed by the assesse






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top