SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Cal) 412

A.K.SENGUPTA, BHAGABATI PRASAD BANERJEE
HOPE (INDIA) LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ROY, Sunil Mitra

AJIT K. SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 256 (1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1963-64, the following questions of law have been referred to this court :"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in upholding the action of the Income-tax Officer in initiating proceedings under Section 147 (a) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, for the assessment year 1963-64 ? 2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in sustaining the addition of the sum of Rs. 77,786 made by the Income-tax Officer as income of the assessee under the head 'other sources' for the assessment year 1963-64 ?"shortly stated, the facts are that the assessee-company started construction of a building in the accounting year 1960-61 and the construction was completed in the accounting year ending on March 31, 1966. The total cost incurred by the assessee on the construction of the building was considered during the assessment year 1966-67 and the Income-tax Officer was of the opinion that the cost disclosed by the assessee was lower than the cost actually incurred. Accordingly, the Income-t








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top