SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1990 Supreme(Cal) 430

KALYANMOY GANGULI
STATESMAN LTD. – Appellant
Versus
SECOND INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.P.GINWALA, PARTHASARATHI SEN GUPTA

KALYANMOY GANGULI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, in the instant application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, pray for a writ, inter alia, in the nature of certiorari requiring respondent 1 "to transmit and certify to this Hon'ble Court the record of the proceedings it had before it under Reference No. 2391 - I. R. I R/131-17/86, dated 29 October 1986, and its order made thereon being Order No. 10, dated 13 November 1987, to be in this Court dealt with in order that your petitioner may have the more sure and speedy justice and that the same may be set aside or quashed" and for a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents and each of them to forbear from enforcing or taking any step to enforce or giving any effect to the said pretended order.

( 2 ) ALTHOUGH the petitioners have prayed for quashing not only the Order No. 10, dated 13 November 1987, but also the order of reference, dated 29 October 1986, yet no argument was advanced on the question of the order of reference being bad in law. The entire argument was directed against the Order No. 10, dated 13 November 1987, allowing the application of respondent 2 workman under Section 15 (2) (b) of the Indust





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top