( 1 ) THIS application for stay dt. 9th Jan, 1989, was moved in an Appeal which was preferred against an order dated 22nd Dec. 1988, made in the concerned Writ Petition, by a learned Judge of this Court.

( 2 ) THE copy of the order was not produced by either of the parties in this proceeding, even though they have filed the other pleadings, since the said copy was not made available to them. But the gist of the order has been quoted in para 4 of the application and that shows that the said order contains two parts and the first part relates to direction on the State Transport Authority concerned, to dispose of an application on consideration of the representation of the petitioner after taking into account a mass petition, the particulars whereof, would be indicated hereinafter, within two weeks from the date of the communication of the order And the second part of the said order is to the effect, that those authorities to make an order to the effect that the Writ petitioner/respondent will run his vehicle in the meantime under the orders of the Court without any permit and further, they should grant temporary permit to the Writ petitioner/respondent. We think, on t