SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 205

S.S.GANGULY, AJIT KUMAR NAYAK
ORIENTAL FIRE AND GENL INS. CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
JOSHEDA ALIAS JOSHODA BALA GHANTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMAL KUMAR MITRA, M.K.BOSE, N.R.MAJUMDAR, SAMINDRA KUMAR DAS

AJIT KUMAR NAYAK, J.

( 1 ) THE only short question that has been raised in these two appeals heard analogously, viz. , Nos. 406 and 407 of 1980, arising out of the decision of the Claims Tribunal Judge, dated 18th September, 1979, is the extent of liability of the appellant insurance company. It has been urged that in view of the specific provisions contained in Section 95 (2) (b) of the Motor Vehicles Act, the upper limit of liability of an insurer cannot exceed Rs. 5,000/- in anyone accident, involving a vehicle carrying passengers.

( 2 ) IT is an admitted position that following an accident on 19. 6. 1977, involving passenger bus No. WWB 2226, in the district of Midna-pore, two claim petitions were filed before the Claims Tribunal Judge, Midnapore, one in respect of deceased passenger, Hemanta Kumar Samanta, travelling by the said bus and the other in respect of a helper employee, Binoy Krishna Ghanta, of the offending bus meeting the same fate. Both the claim petitions were tried and heard analogously and disposed of by the same judgment by the Tribunal Judge, awarding compensation of Rs. 45,000/-to the heirs of the deceased passenger and Rs. 27,000/- in respect of the helper










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top