SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 523

UMESH C.BANERJEE
NOPANY AND SONS PRIVATE LTD – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


UMESH CHANDRA BANERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE basic requirement of the provisions of section 434 of the Companies Act is the existence of a debt due and payable by the company to the petitioning creditor and in the event the petitioning creditor establishes such a claim even though prima facie, question of the maintainability of the petition under the provisions of the Companies Act for winding up of the company cannot be doubted. At this juncture it is to be noted that this burden lies on the company to satisfy the Court as to the existence of a bona fide dispute in regard to the matter in issue and in the event a debt is bona fide disputed, proper Course would be for the Law Courts not to proceed with the winding up proceedings further and leave be given to the petitioning creditor to file a suit for the adjudication of disputes in the matter in issue. While directing filing of the suit, the Court may, however also, direct furnishing of some securities. Incidentally, it is to be noted however that where a debt is disputed, it is the duty of the Court to go into the question of genuineness or otherwise of the dispute and in the event the Court is primarily satisfied as regards its genuine


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top