SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 541

KALYANMOY GANGULI
GAUTAM ROY – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ALOKE GHOSH, J.N.Ram, KASHI KANTA MAITRA, SATYA BRATA MAJUMDER, Sovanlal Hazra

K. GANGULI, J.

( 1 ) IN this application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the petitioner, inter alia prays for a writ in the nature of Mandamus commanding the respondents to do their public duties in accordance with law and to forbear them from giving any effect or any further effect to the provisions of the West Bengal Licencing of Dealers of Cement and Distribution of Levy cement Order, 1982 to non-levy cement business. Although the matter was contested by the State but no affidavit-in-opposition has been filed by the State.

( 2 ) THE short point involved in the case is as to whether the provisions of West Bengal Licencing of Dealers of Cement and Distribution of levy Cement Order, 1982 are applicable in case of non-levy cement business.

( 3 ) SECTION 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, inter alia, provides that the Central Government may, in appropriate cases, by, an order provide for regulating by licences; permits or otherwise the production or manufacture of any essential commodity or for regulating by licences, permits or otherwise the storage, transport, distribution, disposal, acquisition, use or consumption of any essential commodity.

( 4 ) SECTION 5 of







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top