SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 31

PROBODH DINKARRAO DESAI, A.K.SENGUPTA
POTTERY MAZDOOR PANCHAYAT – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Asoke Kumar Ganguly, Pronab Kumar Chattopadhyay, S.PAL

DESAI, C. J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is taken up for hearing by treating it as included in the day's cause list.

( 2 ) THE appellants herein were the original writ petitioners and the respondents herein were the respondents in the writ petition out of which the present appeal arises. The relief claimed in the said writ petition, inter alia, was to direct the respondents to give effect forthwith to the order dated September 8, 1987 and the circular dated September 17, 1987 (annexures "a" and "b", to the writ petition) and to extend the benefit of enhanced interim relief to the concerned employees of the second respondent-company, in terms of the said order and the said circular. The writ petition was dismissed by the learned single judge holding that in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in State of Rajasthan v. Swaika Properties, this court had no territorial jurisdiction to entertain the writ petition. Hence, the present appeal.

( 3 ) THE order (annexure "a") issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Industry (Bureau of Public Enterprises), states, inter alia, that the Government had decided to authorise the management of public sector enterprises of industrial D. A. to s



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top