SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 46

KHWAJA MOHAMMAD YUSUF
ASOKA ROY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.BHATTACHARJI, N.CHAUDHARY

K. M. YUSUF, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners pursuant to an advertisement applied for the post of Teachers in different Primary Schools in urban area in the district of 24-Parganas and they were duly selected for the interview. The petitioners appeared before the Interview Board and empanelled in 1981 as qualified candidates for the Primary School Teachers in Serial Nos. 26, 6, 84 and 36 respectively. Since then the selected candidates were absorbed in the post of the Teachers only not serially from the panel but even from outside the panel. The petitioners came to know in July 1986 that fresh recruitment for the post of Primary Teachers through different Employment Exchanges in the urban area within the district is going to be made. The case of the petitioners is that the preparation of the new panel amounts to virtual cancellation of old panel of 1981 to the prejudice of the petitioners. The writ petitioners had referred to a judgment delivered by me on 12th August, 1987 in C. O. No, 12112 (W) of 1986 (Arun Kumar Chowdhury and Ors. vs. Secretary, Ministry of Education (Primary) and Ors.) wherein some petitioners who were empanelled in the panel of 1981 moved the writ petition and I dir







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top