SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 70

High Court Of Calcutta
DILIP KUMAR BASU
JAISREE PAL - Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL - Respondent
C. O.  10969 (W)  Of  1988
Decided On : 02/28/1989

Advocates Appeared:
A.R.GOSWAMI, B.BHATTACHARJI, GITA GUPTA, P.K.CHATTERJI, P.K.GIRI, P.R.MITRA, R.N.MISRA, S.B.BHUNIYA

Students cannot be held responsible for the irregularities in their admission if they were admitted by the college authority even though they did not have the prescribed marks.

Headnote:

EDUCATION - Admission - Irregularity - Students admitted in science stream without prescribed marks - College authority detected irregularities after eight months - Students directed to change subjects or take fresh admission - Students challenged action - Court held that students cannot be held responsible for lapses of the college authority - Directed the college authority to allow the students to appear in the ensuing Higher Secondary Examination.

Fact of the Case:

10 students, through their respective guardians, studying in Higher Secondary Science Course, challenged the action of the Principal, Midnapore College when admission of these students in the said college in Class XI, Science Group, for Session 1987-88 was found irregular and when the Secretary (Examination) West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education referred to consider a representation of the students and that of college to regularise their admission.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the college authority was responsible for the irregularities in the admission of the students and that the students cannot be held responsible for the lapses of the college authority.

Issues: Whether the students can be held responsible for the irregularities in their admission.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the students cannot be held responsible for the irregularities in their admission as they were admitted by the college authority even though they did not have the prescribed marks.

Final Decision: The court directed the college authority to allow the students to appear in the ensuing Higher Secondary Examination.

DILIP KUMAR BASU, J.


( 1 ) IN this writ application 10 students, through their respective guardians, studying in Higher Secondary Science Course, at the material time, have challenged certain action of the Principal, Midnapore College i. e. respondent No. 2 when admission of these students in the said college in Class XI, Science Group, for Session 1987-88 was found irregular and when the Secretary (Examination) West Bengal Council of Higher Secondary Education referred to consider a representation of the students and that of college to regularise their admission.

( 2 ) ON 22nd September, 1988, this court passed an interim order prohibiting and restraining respondents concerned from changing and/or for directing the petitioners to give option for changing science groups to arts groups in the Class XII final examination. Before considering claim of the petitioners, facts, transpire from the affidavit in opposition filed by the Principal, Midnapore College, i. e. respondent No. 2, are worth mentioning.

( 3 ) ON 2nd July, 1988, affairs of 17 students, as regards admission in the Higher Secondary Science Course, were detected inasmuch as those students did not obtain the prescribed marks in physical science and/or mathematics in the last qualifying examination. Respondent No. 2, on 2nd July, 1988, directed those 17 petitioners to apply for change of their subjects as permissible under Rules and/or to take fresh admission in Class 11 for the Session 87-88 with subjects as per provisions of H. S. Council and the stipulations in the college prospectus. 10 students are among those 17 students. On 27th July, 1988, guardians of those 17 students were requested to meet the Principal i. e. respondent No. 2, on August 1 and 2, 1988 to discuss the matter. In the month of July, 1988, on diverse dates, representations were made before the said respondent No. 2 on behalf of these 17 students. It was contended that they were admitted in Class XI Science Stream in the year 1987 in 87-88 session and were allowed to continue the said course regularly and on successful completion of the course in Class XI, they were promoted to Class XII Science stream in 1988. It has been alleged in the one of the representation dated 26th July, 1988, inter alia. "that we are in progress since the dates of our admission,, we scent foul smell from your end with an attempt to debar us from continuing such science course for the reason of non-obtaining of 45% marks in physical science without caring for our academic lives. The college authority having been satisfied with our academic attainment on verification of our records during admission as well as forwarding the registration forms to the said council, allowed us to continue is science stream, but it is reliably learnt that you are going to prevent us from allowing us to continue the said course in science stream. If that be so, our lives will be at stake and thereby our future career will be uncertain too for no fault of ours so far as the instant matter is concerned. We are of view that such uncertainty in our academic career is ultimately rest with you for which you are earnestly requested by us to move the appropriate authority for safety of our academic lives so that we are not put to any inconvenient situation causing irreparable loss. In the present moment we having been disappointed, are in a fix what to do. We have become mentally disbalanced for such alleged action. We, therefore, earnestly beg the favour of your kind sympathy towards our continuance in science stream with an opportunity to be eligible for appearing at the ensuing Higher Secondary Examination in 1989. "3a. Though the irregularities in the matter of admission, in science stream in 1987-88, were detected before 2nd July, 1988, the Principal i. e. respondent No. 2, after some exercises at his end, addressed a letter, for the first time, under reference No. 2635 dated 2nd August, 1988, to the Secretary (Examination), W. B. C. H. S. , Educ























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top