SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 80

M.K.MUKHERJEE
DAYAMAY BHATTACHARYA – Appellant
Versus
SURYA KANTA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.TIWARI, G.MUKHERJEE, R.N.MISRA, S.K.BASIL, SUBHAS BASU, T.N.BASU

M. K. MUKHERJEE, J.


( 1 ) ORDER :- Dayamay Bhattacharya (hereinafter referred to as the 'petitioner') filed an application under S. 144, Cr. P. C. before the learned Executive Magistrate, Barrackpore against Sri Surya Kanta Sur, Sri Sujit Kumar Sur, Sri Radheshyam Ghosh and some unknown others alleging that they were disturbing his peaceful possession in respect of the land described in the Schedule to the said application and praying for an order restraining them from interfering with his such possession. On that application the learned Magistrate passed the following ex parte order on Jan. 19, 1989. "seen petition. Heard the Id. lawyer. O. C. Dum Duni P. S. will please enquire and report by 23-3-89 and see that no breach of peace takes place in the disputed place. O. C. will enquire if any civil case is pending in the matter. The scheduled plots belonging to the F. P. shall not be encroached or dug by the members of the O. P. in any way. There shall be no violent incident over the issue. Legal protection be given to thed F. P. "

( 2 ) ALLEGING non-compliance with the above order, in spite of service thereof the petitioner moved this Court by filing an application under Art. 226 o








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top