MAHITOSH MAJUMDAR, PADMA KHASTGIR
GOPAL VYAS – Appellant
Versus
SINCLAIR HOTELS AND TRANSPORTATION LTD – Respondent
( 1 ) THE only point which calls far consideration in this application arises under the following facts and circumstances.
( 2 ) THE petitioner Gopal Vyas filed a suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code. In the said suit the petitioner moved an application before Mr. Justice R. N. Pyne (as His Lordship then was) whereupon the learned Judge directed that the Annual General Meeting of the Company Sinclair Hotels and Transportation Ltd. be held under the chairmanship of a member of the Bar but for adjournments of the same until further orders. The petitioner being aggrieved thereby preferred this appeal apart from the usual prayers the petitioner prayed for an order directing the Company to hold the 14th Annual General Meeting and at such meeting to consider the notices and the proposal made by the petitioner under Section 257 of the Companies Act.
( 3 ) THE petitioner Gopal Vyas proposed the candidature of one Navin Chand Suchanti for the office of a director of the respondent No. 1 at such Annual General Meeting. The petitioner had given a notice under Section 257 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner contended that the Company was under an
REFERRED TO : Indian Cable Company Ltd. v. Smt. Sumitra Chakraborty
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.