SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 132

MAHITOSH MAJUMDAR, PADMA KHASTGIR
GOPAL VYAS – Appellant
Versus
SINCLAIR HOTELS AND TRANSPORTATION LTD – Respondent


PADMA KHASTGIR, J, J.


( 1 ) THE only point which calls far consideration in this application arises under the following facts and circumstances.

( 2 ) THE petitioner Gopal Vyas filed a suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Civil Procedure Code. In the said suit the petitioner moved an application before Mr. Justice R. N. Pyne (as His Lordship then was) whereupon the learned Judge directed that the Annual General Meeting of the Company Sinclair Hotels and Transportation Ltd. be held under the chairmanship of a member of the Bar but for adjournments of the same until further orders. The petitioner being aggrieved thereby preferred this appeal apart from the usual prayers the petitioner prayed for an order directing the Company to hold the 14th Annual General Meeting and at such meeting to consider the notices and the proposal made by the petitioner under Section 257 of the Companies Act.

( 3 ) THE petitioner Gopal Vyas proposed the candidature of one Navin Chand Suchanti for the office of a director of the respondent No. 1 at such Annual General Meeting. The petitioner had given a notice under Section 257 of the Companies Act, 1956. The petitioner contended that the Company was under an














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top