SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 235

PRABIR KUMAR MAJUMDAR
AAJKAAL PUBLISHERS PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, MANICKTOLA CHARGE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
GOPAL CHAKRABORTY, S.N.BOSE, SANJUKTA BHATTACHARYA

PRABIR KUMAR MAJUMDAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is directed against the order dated 22nd July, 1988, passed by the Commercial Tax Officer, Manicktola charge, by which the Commercial Tax Officer, Manicktola charge, has held that the petitioners' sports magazine "khela" is not a newspaper for the purpose of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), and the petitioner No. 1 being the dealer is not entitled to the benefit of purchasing raw materials at a concessional rate on the strength of declaration in form XXIVA for use in the publication of "khela".

( 2 ) THE petitioner No. 1 is the printer and publisher of the newspaper "aajkaal" and also a dealer under the said Act as also the Central Sales Tax Act. It is the case of the petitioner No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as "the company") that the business of the company is to manufacture or produce daily newspapers and periodicals and by virtue of registration certificate granted to the company under the relevant Sales Tax Act, the company for the purpose of manufacturing or producing newspapers and periodicals is entitled to purchase raw materials

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top