SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 268

A.K.SENGUPTA, P.D.DESAI
J. N. CHEMICAL (PVT. ) LTD – Appellant
Versus
CEGAT – Respondent


P. D. DESAI, J.

( 1 ) THE appeal is taken up for hearing by treating it as included in the day's cause list. Filing of the paper book is dispensed with and the undertaking given in that behalf is discharged.

( 2 ) THE appeal arises out of a Writ Petition which was directed against an order dated March 16, 1988 passed by the Calcutta Bench of the Central Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "the Tribunal") on an application for dispensing with the statutory requirement of pre-deposit of the amount of duty and penalty in dispute in appeal. The present appeal has been brought in view of the summary dismissal of the Writ Petition by the Trial Court.

( 3 ) THE following facts are not in dispute : (1) The original demand for excise duty was raised in respect of precipitated chalk manufactured by the appellant. (2) The case of the appellant before the competent authority was that precipitated chalk was eligible for exemption under Notification No. 23/55 dated April 29,1955. (3) The competent authority rejected the claim for exemption substantially on the ground that unless the product in question was shown to have been finally used in the manufacture







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top