SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 460

SHAMSUDDIN AHMED, HARIDAS DAS
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Appellant
Versus
HARIPADA SANTRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AJOY DUTT, APURBA, ARUN DEB, B.B.SARKAR, SANKAR MUKHERJI

SHAMSUDDIN AHMED, J.

( 1 ) THE short question that crops up for determination in this revisional application is if in terms of clause 13 approval in West Bengal Form No. 2908, Department of Public Works, Tender for supply of materials, reading as `in the event of a dispute the decision of the Superintending Engineer of the Circle shall be final' constituted an arbitration agreement.

( 2 ) THE parties herein entered into an agreement for supply of materials and the said agreement is embodied in the form referred to above. The opposite parties supplied the materials in question as directed and as an amount of Rs. 2, 50, 000/- was not paid, they invoked clause 13 of the said agreement and asked the Superintending Engineer to enter into an arbitration. As it was refused they filed Judicial Misc. Case No. 37 of 86 in the court of the Assistant Dist. Judge, Alipore for referring the dispute to arbitration by Mr. H. B. Lahiri, a retired Superintending Engineer, Construction Board, Directorate of Public Works Department as Arbitrator to settle the dispute. The State appeared and contended that there was no arbitration clause and therefore the question of appointment of an arbitrator does





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top