SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Cal) 478

High Court Of Calcutta
AJIT KUMAR SENGUPTA, J. N. HORE
HARI MAJHI - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
Criminal Appeal 432  Of  1987
Decided On : 09/26/1989

Advocates Appeared:
BIKASH RANJAN BHATTACHARJI, P.N.GHOSH, Sanat Chowdhury

Consent and dishonest intentions are crucial factors in determining guilt in cases of rape and cheating.

Headnote:

Rape - Consent - S. 376 of the Penal Code - S. 417 of the Penal Code

Fact of the Case:

The appellant was convicted for rape and cheating based on the prosecution's claim that he had sexual intercourse with the complainant under false promises of marriage, resulting in pregnancy.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the sexual intercourse was consensual as the complainant, being above the age of 16, was competent to give consent. The charge of cheating under S. 417 could not be substantiated as there was no evidence to prove that the accused made false representations with dishonest intentions.

Issues: The issues revolved around the consent of the complainant, the validity of the promise of marriage, and the application of S. 375 and S. 417 of the Penal Code.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the accused could not be held guilty of rape as the sexual intercourse was consensual, and the charge of cheating could not be substantiated due to lack of evidence of dishonest intentions.

Final Decision: The appeal was allowed, and the conviction and sentence of the accused were set aside.

AJIT KUMAR SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant has been convicted and sentenced by additional sessions judge, 2nd court, Hooghly, to rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years and to pay a fine of Rs. 6000/- in default rigorous imprisonment for two years more under S. 376 of the Penal Code. He was also sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year for offence under S. 417 of the Penal Code. Both sentences were directed to run consecutively. The case of the prosecution is briefly stated as under :

( 2 ) THE complainant Aloka Majhi (P. W. 1) a young unlettered village girl, and the accused Hari Majhi alias Hari Malik, a young man, were living in the same village Banna under Police Station Dhaniakhali within District Hooghly. At the relevant time Aloka used to do the work of cultivation of her land in a field of her village; she was unmarried and aged about 21 years. The accused also used to work in the same filed at that time. In Jaistha 1387 B. S. (corresponding to May 1981) one day while Aloka was working in her land in that field the accused was also then working in an adjacent land there and at that time the accused picked up acquaintance with her. From that day onwards the accused gradually developed intimacy with Aloka in course of their working in the same field. Thereafter one day the accused taking advantage of that intimacy wanted to have sexual intercourse with her but Aloka expressed her disagreement to that. The accused at that time gave her assurance that he would marry her and in reply to that she told him to make that proposal before her parents. Then the accused went to her house and expressed his desire before her parents that he would marry her. After about 3/4 days from that incident the accused came near the house of Aloka and called her to come outside her house, took her to a field and performed sexual intercourse with Aloka forcibly against her will. Since after this incident of rape, the accused frequently used to have sexual intercourse with her after every 3/4 days. Aloka during that period repeatedly requested the accused to marry her as per his assurance but the accused passed time and yet persuaded her to believe that he would marry her. In this manner out one year elapsed. In the meantime Aloka became pregnant for three months in consequence of sexual intercourse with her by the accused as above. The parents of Aloka intimated that fact to some persons of their locality who then called the accused before them. The accused confessed before those persons that he had sexual intercourse with Aloka and as a result thereof she was impregnated by him. He assured before the persons of the locality that he would marry her. But the accused did not marry Aloka and passed time and finally he told her as well as her parents that he would not marry her and left for a village named Kanajuli to marry another woman.

( 3 ) IT may be mentioned that the first sexual intercourse took place sometime in May 1981 and the First Information Report was lodged on 7th March, 1983.

( 4 ) THE first charge against the accused is that he had sexual intercourse with Aloka Majhi against her will or without her consent. The second charge is that the accused cheated the said Aloka Majhi is that he induced her intentionally by giving false assurance to her that the accused would marry her and by such inducement she was seduced by the accused for making sexual intercourse. The entire case of the prosecution depends on the evidence of Aloka Majhi, the complainant, P. W. 1. She has said in her evidence as follows :-"about four years back, one day at about 11 a. m. while I was working in the field of out village accused Haru Majhi told me that he would marry me and saying that he caught hold of me. I protested against him for his such act as there were many persons in the field at that time. I then extricated myself from the clutches of the accused. The accused again told that he would marry me and I need not be afraid of him



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top