SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Cal) 421

M.N.RAY, A.C.SENGUPTA
UNIVERSITY OF CALCUTTA – Appellant
Versus
SHYAMAL KUMAR DAS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ABHAS CHANDRA, Bikash Ranjan Patranabis, D.N.Batabyal, SUSANTA CHATTERJI

ROY, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an application by the appellant/petitioners, who were Respondents in the original proceeding (hereinafter referred to as the said petitioners), for stay of an order dated 25th September, 1984, passed in that proceeding. By such order the learned trial Judge, has directed the authorities of the said petitioners to hold a supplementary examination for those candidates who passed in Part II Examination but failed in Part I Examination and lost their chances. Such examinations may be held a long with the supplementary examination to be held for Part II candidates by changing the date of examination or by holding a separate examination as may be convenient to the University preferably within December, 1984. It is observed that if possible both the special examination for part I and part II should be held simultaneously and while making such order, the learned trial Judge, also refused to stay the operation of his order.

( 2 ) THE writ petitioners while moving this Court for a Rule stated that petitioner No. 1 Sri Shyamal Kumar Das appeared for B. Com. Part I Examination in 1979-80 but could not pass in Bengali, Economics and Accountancy Group. He sat both in Part












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top