SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Cal) 90

MONOJ KUMAR MUKHERJEE
SANATAN GANGULY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGOL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.N.SUR, R.K.Dev Choudhury, S.K.DAS GUPTA, S.N.CHAUDHARY, TAPAN KUMAR MUKHERJEE

MONOJ KUMAR KUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE Assistant Registrar of Companies, West Bengal, filed a complaint against the four directors of Ganguly Traders (P) Ltd. of 7, Bipin Behari Ganguli Street, Calcutta, in the court of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Calcutta, alleging commission of an offence under Section 210 (5) of the Companies Act, 1956, hereinafter referred to as " the Act", By his order, dated November 3, 1978, the learned Magistrate took cognizance upon the same, issued process against the accused and transferred the case to the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 11th Court, Calcutta, for disposal. After entering appearance, one of the accused, Sri Sanatan Ganguly, filed an application under Section 633 (1) of the Act for being relieved of his liability, as a director of the company, in respect of the offence alleged against him. In his application he contended, inter alia, that the other directors were inimically disposed towards him and in spite of his best efforts he could not persuade them to comply with the requirements of Section 210 (1) and (3) of the Act, for which the prosecution had been launched. Along with the application he filed some documents in suppo







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top