SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Cal) 175

A.K.SENGUPTA
SUSANTA KUMAR BASAK – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMAL BARAN CHATTERJEE, RUPEN MITRA

AJIT KUMAR SENGUPTA, J.

( 1 ) PURSUANT to the application made by the petitioner, the petitioner was allotted in November, 1983, a flat being Flat No. 5, Block F-1 in the Low Income Group Housing Estate at Karim Box row on a monthly rent of Rs. 106/ -. The petitioner obtained the possession of the said Flat on 17th December, 1973 in pursuance of the allotment letter dated 20th November, 1973 addressed to the petitioner at 169b, Ramesh Datta Street, Calcutta. The terms and conditions of the tenancy are contained in an agreement executed at the time of taking possession of the said flat. The said Articles of Agreement, inter alia, provides that the tenant shall have no right or be entitled to assign and/or sub-let the said flat or any part of the same (Clause 15 ). Clause 16 of the said agreement provides that if the tenant, shall commit any breach of the terms and conditions, the Governor shall be entitled to terminate the said agreement which shall thereupon stand determined and the tenant shall forthwith make, quit, vacant and peaceful possession of the said flat to the Executive Engineer in-Charge of the said flat. It is also provided therein that after the termination of the te



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top