SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Cal) 104

AMITABHA DUTTA, PRADYOT KUMAR BANERJEE
SATYANARAYAN SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STAR COMPANY LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.SEN GUPTA, B.C.Dutt, Hirendra Chunder Ghosh, JAYA BOSE, M.M.SAHAI, Sudhis Das Gupta, Sumit Ghosh

F. K. BANERIEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal by the defendants arises out of a suit for recovery of arrears of rent and mesne profit. About 21 cottahas 6 chattachs of land in premises No. 8, Circular Garden Reach Road with structures thereon as described in Part I and about 15 cottahs 14 chataks and 8 sq. ft. land in premises No. 5, Circular Garden Reach Road with structures thereon as described in part 2 of the schedule of the plaint formed the subject matter of the suit.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff's case was that he was the owner of the suit premises Nos. 5 and 8 Circular Garden Reach Road by means of purchase from the trustees of the Calcutta Improvement Trust on 15-1-47 in which defendants' predecessor-in-interest Dindayal Shah was a confirming party. The defendants by a lease dated 15-1-47 took the lease of the property in question for 20 years commencing from 15-1-47 at a monthly rental of Rs. 1620/ -. It was alleged that the rent should be paid within first week of the month for which rent is due. It is also alleged that in the said document the defendant-tenant is to pay the owner's and occupier's share of municipal taxes. It is further agreed that on determination of the tenancy, defen
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top