SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Cal) 13

High Court Of Calcutta
B. C. Ray
INDUSTRIAL FUEL MARKETING CO. - Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) - Respondent
C. R.  4093 (W)  Of  1980
Decided On : 01/28/1983

Advocates Appeared:
Anindya Kumar Mitra, B.MAJUMDAR, GOUTAM CHAKRABORTY, M.P.MEHARIA, NARATTAM CHATTERJEE, P.K.Chatterjee, R.C.DEBNATH, RANJIT KR.SANYAL, S.PAL, SAMAR BANERJI, SOMNATH CHATTERJI

Headnote:

MINES AND MINERALS - Coal-ejects - Group VI coal - Whether the petitioners have acquired a right to collect and remove the coal-ejects deposited on the river bed as well as on the agricultural fields by virtue of the indenture of lease dated 9th April, 1975 - Whether the indenture of lease is a mining lease - Whether the State of Bihar is entitled to settle the right to win coal particles, that is, slurry from the river bed as well as from the fields nearby whereon the same is deposited - Whether the respondent No. 3 has lost title over the fine particles of coal/slurry by abandonment and the petitioners by taking possession on the basis of the Indenture of lease have acquired title to the same.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners challenged the institution of the criminal case being Petarbar P. S. Case No. 2 dated 4th April, 1982 against them on the ground that the said criminal proceeding was wrongly started against them and also for a mandate restraining the respondents from interfering with the petitioners right to collect sludge or slurry elected, from the coal washeries known as Kathaya Kargaji and Swang washeries belonging to the respondent No. 3, the Central Coalfields Ltd. The petitioners, on 19th Aug., 1974, applied to the respondent No. 2, State of Bihar for permission to remove the ejected sludge deposited in the manner aforesaid for the purpose mentioned in the said letter a copy of which is annexed as Annexure 'a' to the petition. The State of Bihar the respondent No. 2, by an Indenture dated 9th April, 1975 entered into between the State Government on the one hand and the petitioners Nos. 2, 3 and 4 on behalf of the aforesaid firm granted settlement in favour of the firm of the right to remove the aforesaid ejects or effluents from the river bed of River Damodar as well as from the agricultural fields belonging to the raiyat on taking the consent of these raiyats as well as from the lands belonging to the State Government for a period of 10 years from 9th April, 1975 on payment of royalty as specified in the said Indenture.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the petitioners have not acquired any right to collect and remove the coal-ejects deposited on the river bed as well as on the agricultural fields by virtue of the indenture of lease dated 9th April, 1975. The indenture of lease is a mining lease and the State of Bihar is not entitled to settle the right to win coal particles, that is, slurry from the river bed as well as from the fields nearby whereon the same is deposited. The respondent No. 3 has not lost title over the fine particles of coal/slurry by abandonment and the petitioners by taking possession on the basis of the Indenture of lease have not acquired title to the same.

Issues: Whether the petitioners have acquired a right to collect and remove the coal-ejects deposited on the river bed as well as on the agricultural fields by virtue of the indenture of lease dated 9th April, 1975 - Whether the indenture of lease is a mining lease - Whether the State of Bihar is entitled to settle the right to win coal particles, that is, slurry from the river bed as well as from the fields nearby whereon the same is deposited - Whether the respondent No. 3 has lost title over the fine particles of coal/slurry by abandonment and the petitioners by taking possession on the basis of the Indenture of lease have acquired title to the same.

Ratio Decidendi: The indenture of lease-in-question does amount, to a mining lease as it purports to confer the right on the lessor (lessee?) that is the petitioners to win that is to set coal particles that is slurry deposited on the river bed as well as on the adjoining fields. Under the provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 it has been expressly prohibited by Section 4 (2) that no such prospecting licence or mining lease shall be granted otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the Rules made thereunder. Section 5. Sub-section (2) expressly prohibits the grant of such mining lease without the previous approval of the Central Government. Moreover Section 4 (a) provides for premature termination of mining lease in respect of any mineral other than a minor mineral.

Final Decision: Rule discharged without any order as to costs. All interim orders are vacated. The money or bank guarantee that has been furnished in favour of the Registrar, Appellate Side of this court will be utilised towards the price of the slurry which have been removed by the petitioners and are sold in the market and if any balance is left the same will be returned. Prayer for stay is rejected.

B. C. RAY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner No. 1, Messrs. Industrial Fuel Marketing Co. , a partnership firm duly registered under the Partnership Act and the petitioners Nos. 2, 3 and 4 who are the partners of the aforesaid firm have assailed in this writ application the institution of the criminal case being Petarbar P. S. Case No. 2 dated 4th April, 1982 on the ground that the said criminal proceeding was wrongly started against the petitioners and also for a mandate restraining the respondents from interfering with the petitioners right to collect sludge or slurry elected, from the coal washeries known as Kathaya Kargaji and Swang washeries belonging to the respondent No. 3, the Central Coalfields Ltd.

( 2 ) THE sallent facts as appear from the petition are as follows, the respondents, Central Coalfields Limited and Coal India Limited are Government Companies, previously, the National Coal Development Corporation Limited (commonly referred to as NCDC) was the Owner of Goal Washeries known as Kathara, Karsali and Swang washeries situate in the District of Giridih in the State of Bihar. The said Coal Washeries have now vested in the respondent No. 3, the Central Coalfields limited. In these washeries a large quantity of coal from Hazaribagh/giridih Coalfields is brought in for the purpose of processing in order to bring out the good qualities of coal which are required in the Steel Plants. In the course of such processing very fine particles of coal known as slurry are ejected and the same are taken in the several ponds known as slurry ponds or tants wherein the coal particles ejected with the water coming out of the aforesaid washeries are deposited. These slurry ponds or tanks cannot keep all the ejects coming out of the coal washeries and the water with coal particles ejected from the washeries overflows these tanks or ponds into the neighbouring fields and also into the river Damodar. As a result, this elected sludge or slurry with the coal particles He on the agricultural fields as well as on the river teed. It has been pleaded that this causes great 'damage to the fertility of the soil and pollutes the water of the river and the streams. It has been pleaded that this coal ejects overflowing from the reservoirs and after escaping from the limits of the concerned washeries become part and parcel of the soil with which it gets mixed up. As regards the ejected sludge deposited in the river bed it becomes part and parcel of the river bed.

( 3 ) THE petitioners on 19th Aug. , 1974, applied to the respondent No. 2, State of Bihar for permission to remove the ejected sludge deposited in the manner aforesaid for the purpose mentioned in the said letter a copy of which is annexed as Annexure 'a' to the petition. The State of Bihar the respondent No. 2, by an Indenture dated 9th April, 1975 entered into between the State Government on the one hand and the petitioners Nos. 2, 3 and 4 on behalf of the aforesaid firm granted settlement in favour of the firm of the right to remove the aforesaid ejects or effluents from the river bed of River Damodar as well as from the agricultural fields belonging to the raiyat on taking the consent of these raiyats as well as from the lands belonging to the State Government for a period of 10 years from 9th April, 1975 on payment of royalty as specified in the said Indenture. It has been further recited in the said Indenture of lease that these elects/sludge being a mineral the State Government is the owner of the same by virtue of the entire estate including the minerals having vested in the State Government under the provisions of Bihar Land Reforms Act. It has also been recited therein that in the second Schedule attached to the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 (Act 67 of 1957) there are six groups of coal and the ejects/ sludge have been grouped under Group No. VI Coal-ejects and the rate of royalty payable in respect of the same has been fixed at 40 paise per tonne. A copy

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top