High Court Of Calcutta
ANIL KUMAR SEN, S. N. SANYAL
BINAPANI BASU - Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) - Respondent
C. O. 3003 Of 1982
Decided On : 03/16/1983
TELEGRAPH ACT, 1885 - SECTION 10(D) AND 16(3) - COMPENSATION FOR DAMAGES - SCOPE - CLAIM FOR DAMAGES DUE TO TORTIOUS ACT - MAINTAINABILITY - DAMAGES SUSTAINED BY REASON OF EXERCISE OF POWERS UNDER SECTION 10 - INCLUDES DAMAGES DUE TO TORTIOUS ACT - APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 16(3) - MAINTAINABLE.
Fact of the Case:
The applicant sought compensation under Section 16(3) of the Telegraph Act, 1885, alleging that the telegraph authorities negligently caused damage to her property while drawing and connecting a telephone wire over her house. The telegraph authorities denied liability, claiming that the damage was caused by the subscriber's negligence in setting up an inadequately strong pillar.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the application was maintainable under Section 16(3) of the Act, as the claim for damages arose from the negligent exercise of powers under Section 10 of the Act, which authorizes the telegraph authority to place and maintain telegraph lines over immovable property.
Issues: Whether a claim for damages due to a tortious act can be entertained in a proceeding under Section 16(3) of the Telegraph Act, 1885.
Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 10(d) of the Act, which provides for compensation for damages sustained by reason of the exercise of powers under Section 10, to include damages caused by a tortious act committed while exercising those powers. The court reasoned that the provision was intended to provide compensation for any damage sustained, not just damage caused by the trespass itself.
Final Decision: The court allowed the revisional application, set aside the order of the District Judge dismissing the application, and remanded the proceeding back to the District Judge for adjudication of the claim on its merits.
( 1 ) AN application under Section 16 (3), Telegraph Act, 1885 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) which had been registered as Misc. Case No. 103 of 1980 was dismissed by the learned District Judge, Howrah by his order dated August 28, 1982. It was so dismissed not on merits but on the technical ground that such an application was not maintainable in law. Feeling aggrieved, the applicant has moved the present revisional application challenging the said order. The application is being heard on contest by the respondent the Union of India.
( 2 ) IN laying her claim for compensation under Section 16 (3) of the Act, the applicant made out a case that the telegraph authorities were engaged in pulling and connecting telephone wire from a telephone post situate on the south of the dwelling house of the applicant at Andul Daspara Road to a brick built piller set up for the said purpose at the subscriber's premises on an adjoining plot on August 26, 1977. The said wire was being drawn and connected "over, in, upon and across the private path/passage and over the eastern verandah" of the applicant's house. The applicant's further case was that there was gross neglect on the part of the telephone authorities in doing the said act when they failed to take proper caution to see whether the pillar that had been set up by the subscriber, was strong enough to sustain the pull of the wire. It was alleged that as a matter of fact a high pillar was wrongfully and illegally built upon the boundary wall of the subscriber without any loadbearing foundation in spite of objections on the part of the applicant. While it was being so done, according to the applicant, the piller gave way, fell upon the applicant's house and damaged her verandah. She having suffered damage in that process, she claimed appropriate damages from the telegraph authorities of respondent 1. When the telegraph authorities refused to compensate her, she filed the application under Section 16 (3) of the Act out of which the present revisional application arises.
( 3 ) THE application was contested by respondent 1 the Union of India. The damage sustained by the applicant could not be denied. But Union of India took the stand that the damage which the applicant had suffered was due to neglect on the part of the subscriber when the subscriber set up a pillar not founded on any sufficiently strong foundation. According to the Union of India, therefore, the damage, if any, was to be compensated by the subscriber and not the telegraph authorities. We may point out at this stage that the claim of the applicant that the telephone wire for the subscriber was being placed over the applicant's house, was not disputed as a fact though respondent 1 took the stand that on that particular date and time there was no drawing of any line or making of any construction by the telegraph authorities; according to respondent I, none of their men was involved in the act resulting in the accident on the date of occurrence.
( 4 ) PARTIES adduced evidence both oral and documentary. The learned District Judge on consideration of evidence so adduced overruled the defence that men of the telephone authorities were, not involved in the act resulting in the accident. He found that the telephone authorities knew how the pillar was' raised and in spite of the fact that the pillar was not secure enough to hold the wire, their men were drawing the line therefrom for giving connection which resulted in that accident. Having overruled that defence, the learned District Judge proceeded to consider whether the claim of compensation as made can be entertained under the provisions of Section 16 (3) of the Act. On this point the learned District Judge, however, took the view that the said provision does not authorise him to entertain any claim of compensation for damages suffered due to negligence. He took the view that under this provision he can award compensation for any toss and damage resulting
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.