SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Cal) 129

A.K.SEN, S.N.SANYAL
ARUN KUMAR BEDI – Appellant
Versus
ANJANA BEDI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.MITRA, SUBRATA ROY, TARUN CHATTEJEE

ANIL K. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revisional application at the instance of the defendant in Money Suit No. 23 of 1979 of the 4th Court of the learned Subordinate Judge at Alipore. The order impugned is one of October 8, 1982, passed by the learned Subordinate Judge deciding preliminary issue as to the jurisdiction of the Court in favour of the plaintiff. The respondent filed the aforesaid suit in the Court of the learned Subordinate Judge at Alipore claiming separate maintenance. Her simple case is that she was married to the petitioner at Delhi and she went over to United Kingdom to reside with her husband, the defendant, since the husband is a resident of the United Kingdom. She further pleaded that being deserted by the husband in the United Kingdom, she was compelled to come back to India and live separately at No. 15, Elgin Road, Calcutta within the jurisdiction of the learned Subordinate Judge. In such circumstances she claimed that she is entitled to separte maintenance and such maintenance not having been provided for by the husband she filed the suit. In pleading the jurisdiction of the Court where the suit had been filed she said "that the cause of action for the suit aro





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top