SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Cal) 256

MONOJ KUMAR MUKHERJEE
SUPROVAT GHOSH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.P.CHATTERJEE, ASIT GOSWAMI, KAMALESH BHATTACHARJI, S.P.ROYCHOWDHURY, SAILENDRA BHUSAN BAKSHI, Saktinath Mukherjee

MANOJ KUMAR MUKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THIS application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by seven legal practitioners who ordinarily act, plead and practice in the Judges' Court at Alipore and also before the Civil authorities connected with requisition and acquisition of properties in the district of 24 Paraganas. Empowered with Vakalatnamas they have been representing their clients at every stage of acquisition proceedings, under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and receiving payments on their behalf. By an order dated Dec. 21, 1982 the Additional District Magistrate (L. R.) 24 Paraganas intimated all concerned that all payments to awardees of Land Acquisition Cases would be made by Account payee cheques direct to the parties on proper identification and not through Lawyers. Aggrieved by the above order the petitioners filed this writ application on Feb. 8, 1983.

( 2 ) FOR expeditious hearing of the application the Court directed the petitioners to serve copies of the application upon the State of West Bengal and the other respondents. When the writ application was pending hearing, some awardees filed an application for being added as parties in the main wri























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top