SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Cal) 143

A.K.SEN, B.C.CHAKRABARTI
HARI SATYA BANERJEE – Appellant
Versus
MAHADEV BANERJEE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
AMIT K.RAKSHIT, MONI MOHAN MUKHERJEE, S.C.MITTAL, S.P.ROYCHOWDHURY

A. K. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal from an appellate decree. Defendant no. 1 and defendants Nos. 3 to 10 are the appellants before us. It arises out of a suit for partition on declaration of plaintiffs 2/3rd share in the suit properties. The suit properties were 11 plots of land appertaining to 4 khatians set out in the plaint schedule. Of these 11 plots 3 plots have been excluded from the suit concurrently by the two Courts upon a finding that in respect of these 3 plots, the plaintiff had failed to make out any case for partition. These 3 plots are Dag Nos. 4882, 4884 of khatian No. 860 and Dag No. 4519 of khatian No. 826. As regards the rest eight plots in suit viz. plots Nos. 4885, 4886, 4941, 4995, 4949, 4950 of khatian No. 860, plot No. 294 of khatian No. 862 and plot No. 4766 of khatian No. 908 while the trial Court decreed the suit declaring 1/3rd share in favour of the plaintiff overruling the plaintiff's claim of acquisition of the other 1/3rd share from defendant No. 2, the Court of appeal below decreed 2/3rd share in favour of the plaintiff upholding the plaintiff's claim of acquisition of such share.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff's case shortly was that the suit properties













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top