SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Cal) 300

High Court Of Calcutta
M. N. Roy
AVERY INDIA LIMITED - Appellant
Versus
THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, ESPLANADE CHARGE - Respondent
Civil Rule 17902 (W)  Of  1975
Decided On : 08/19/1982

Advocates Appeared:
ALOKE GHOSH, Biswarup Gupta, Gopal Dutt, SAMAR DUTT

Weighing and testing machines used in the manufacturing process are entitled to deduction under Section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.

Headnote:

SALES TAX - Deduction of turnover - Weighing and testing machines - Used in manufacturing process - Whether entitled to deduction under Section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, M/s. Avery India Limited, claimed a deduction under Section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 for sales of weighing and testing machines and parts thereof to registered dealers who used them in the manufacture of goods for sale in West Bengal. The Commercial Tax Officer disallowed the claim on the ground that the machines were not required for sale. The petitioner filed an appeal, which was upheld by the Assistant Commercial Tax Officer. On revision, the Additional Commissioner set aside the impugned order and directed the Commercial Tax Officer to make a fresh assessment after allowing the petitioner an opportunity of being heard.

Finding of the Court:

The Commercial Tax Officer again disallowed the claim, holding that the machines were not covered by the registration certificates of the purchasing dealers. The petitioner filed a writ petition in the High Court.

Issues: Whether weighing and testing machines used in the manufacturing process are entitled to deduction under Section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.

Ratio Decidendi: The High Court held that weighing and testing machines used in the manufacturing process are entitled to deduction under Section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941. The court relied on the following principles: * Goods which are consumed in the manufacture of finished products, as also goods which are used in the process of manufacturing so as to make the manufacture commercially expedient, are goods which may be treated as used in the manufacture within the meaning of Section 5(2)(a)(ii) of the Act. * The expression "manufacture of goods" normally covers the entire process of converting the raw materials. * Weighing and testing machines, when used in the manufacturing process, are integrally connected with the ultimate production of goods and are therefore used in the manufacture of goods within the meaning of the Act.

Final Decision: The court allowed the writ petition and directed the Commercial Tax Officer to grant the deduction claimed by the petitioner.

M. N. ROY, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner, M/s. Avery India Limited (hereinafter referred to as the said petitioner) was incorporated under the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, and has its registered office and carries on business, inter alia, at 28/2, Waterloo Street, Calcutta. Such business has been stated to be consisting in the manufacture and sale of weighing and testing machines of various descriptions, and the parts thereof. The said petitioner has also been stated to be duly registered under the provisions of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) and has also been stated to be assessed regularly to sales tax.

( 2 ) IN respect of the period containing the four quarters ended 31st December, 1960, the said petitioner claimed a deduction under the provisions of Section 5 (2) (a) (ii) of the said Act to the tune of Rs. 5,51,014. 40 and Rs. 71,478. 70 and thus for a total sum of Rs. 6,22,493. 10 in respect of the goods which were claimed to be sold to registered dealers under the provisions of the said Act and which have been claimed to be used, directly in the manufacture of goods for sale in West Bengal. It was the case of the said petitioner that during the assessment proceedings for the period, as mentioned hereinbefore, before the Commercial Tax Officer, they duly explained the basis on which the concerned deductions were claimed in respect of the weighing and testing machines and parts thereof, which in short, were claimed to have been sold by the said petitioner to registered dealers. It has also been stated that the said petitioner further explained that the said weighing and testing machines were attached to the manufacturing plant at various points and without weighing and testing materials at various stages of the process, no manufacture could be possible. The said petitioner has also stated to have produced all relevant declaration forms from the concerned registered dealers, who according to them, inter alia, declared that the goods sold by the said petitioner fell within the relevant description as contained in the certificate of registration and were used in the manufacture of goods for sale in the manner as indicated hereinbefore.

( 3 ) IT has been stated that in spite of the above position, the Commercial Tax Officer concerned disallowed the claim in respect of the sum of Rs. 5,51,014. 40 and that too in spite of declaration in form XXIV having been produced, on the ground that the weighing and testing machines could not be admitted or concerned to be required for sale. It has also been stated that the said Commercial Tax Officer made further disallowance of the other sum of Rs. 71,478 as mentioned above from the claim under Section 5 (2) (a) (ii) of the said Act on the ground that the purpose of purchase had not been indicated in the declaration forms XXIV. From such assessment, the said petitioner preferred an appeal before the Assistant Commercial Tax Officer, who upheld the order of assessment on the grounds as mentioned by the Commercial Tax Officer concerned, and on revision thereafter, the Additional Commissioner by his order dated 16th June, 1971, set aside the impugned order with a direction upon the Commercial Tax Officer concerned, to make a fresh assessment after allowing the said petitioner an opportunity of being heard. Such order has been disclosed as annexure A to the petition. From a reference to the order as made, it would appear that in respect of the disallowance of Rs. 5,51,014, the Additional Commissioner concerned directed that the Commercial Tax Officer should verify whether the goods sold by the said petitioner, were covered by the registration certificates of the purchasing dealers, and stated "unless the assessing officer established that the goods purchased were not included in the registration certificate, the claims will have to be allowed on the declaration in form XXIV, no matter how the goods were eventually used". In resp




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top