SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Cal) 48

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, SUHAS C.SEN
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
HINDUSTHAN CHARITY TRUST – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.DEY, AJIT SEN GUPTA, DILIP DHAR, R.N.BAJORIA, Sunil Mukherjee

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) IT appears that the assessee is a trust. The assessment year in this reference is 1960-61. There was a trust. It applied for refund under Section 48 of the Indian I. T. Act, 1922, for the assessment year 1960-61, the relevant accounting period ending on March 31, 1960. The income derived by the trust was from dividends. The asses-see had paid on March 9, 1960, a sum of Rs. 18,950 to another trust called Lakshmi Nath Seva Trust. While the ITO scrutinised the statement filed, he came across this item. According to him, this Lakshmi Nath Seva Trust was a private trust. He observed that the assessee could not prove that the donation was for any public charitable or religious purpose. He, therefore, taxed the sum of Rs. 10,850 at the maximum rate.

( 2 ) BEFORE the AAC, on appeal, the assessee contended that the donation to the trust was made under the belief that it was a charitable trust and that if a donation was made in good faith, it could not be said that the money had been applied for non-charitable purposes. In the alternative, it was pointed out that in the case of Shri Lakshmi Nath Seva Trust the AAC had held, in his order for the assessment year









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top