SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Cal) 200

ARUN KUMAR JANAH
PROF. A. K. SANYAL – Appellant
Versus
CHITTA RANJAN BASISTHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PRADIPTA ROY, Saktinath Mukherjee, SOMNATH CHATTERJI, SUMIT KR.PANJA, TAPASH RAY

ARUN KUMAR JANAH, J.

( 1 ) IN this application the petitioner is challenging an order dated December 23, 1960 passed in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 246 of 1980 by the District Judge, Burdwan. By the said order the learned District Judge allowed the appeal filed by the opposite party No. 1 against an order dated Dec, 22, 1980 passed by the learned Munsif, Second Court, Burdwan in Title Suit No. 313 of 1980 refusing to grant an ad interim injunction as prayed for by the opposite party No. 1, The said suit was filed by the opposite party No. 1 for certain declarations and also for an injunction restraining the governing body of the Burdwan Raj College from giving effect to its resolution dated Dec. 22, 1980 terminating the services of the opposite party No. 1 as Principal of the said College. The prayer for ad interim injunction was disallowed by the trial court and the trial court directed notices to be issued to the defendants and fixed the hearing of the injunction after one week. Against the said order the opposite party No. 1 preferred the miscellaneous appeal to the Court of the District Judge who allowed the appeal and granted an ad interim injunction. Against this appellate orde





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top