MANASH NATH ROY
KANTILAL SOMEHAND SHAH – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE – Respondent
( 1 ) THE petitioners have claimed to be partners of the registered partnership firm M/s. Kantilal Chandulal and Company (hereinafter referred to as the said firm) which had and has the official place of business at 208, Jamunalal Bazaz Street, Calcutta-7. The petitioners have stated to be carrying on business as dealers in diamonds and other precious stones. It was their case that in course of such business, they were required to buy diamonds and jewellery from different parts of India and sell them to their customers at Calcutta. It was also stated by the petitioners that purchases made from the parties, were and are duly entered into the books of accounts of the said Firm and apart from purchase and sale of the materials as mentioned above, the petitioners used to receive diamonds and jewellery from various places, for the purpose of repairing and/or sale on commission basis. It has also been categorically stated by the petitioners that the parties, from whom they used to receive materials for sale and on the basis as mentioned above, do not like to disclose their names prior to completion of final transaction, for avoiding disclosure or exposure of their fina
Collector of Customs and Central Excise, West Bengal and Ors. v. Hindustan Motors Ltd.
Mohanlal Devandanbhai Choksey and Ors. v. M.P.Mondker and Ors.
Radha Kissan More and Ors. v. E.Rajaram Rao and Anr.
K.K.Srivastaran etc. v. Bhupendra Kumar Jain and Ors.
Geep Flash Light Industries Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors.
Faquir Chand Sharma v. C.P.W.D. Work-Charged Staff Consumers Co-operative Societies Ltd. and Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.