B.C.RAY
APARNA BASUMALLIK – Appellant
Versus
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS application is at the instance of the petitioner challenging the validity of the letter dated 19-2-82 communicating the decision of the State Bar Council on the basis of the decision of the Bar Council of India that the petitioner's application for enrolment in the State Bar Council's roll to practise as an Advocate has not been entertained as she did not fulfil the conditions laid down in Rule 1 (c) as framed by the Bar Council of India under Sections 7 (h) (i), 24 (1) (c) (iii) and (iii) (a) and S. 49 (1) (d) of the Advocates Act. 1961 and she was asked to collect the enrolment fee of a sum of Rupees 250/- deposited by her with the Bar Council of West Bengal. The petitioner has stated in her petition that she passed the B. A. Examination in 1972 from the University of Calcutta and thereafter she passed the M. A. Examination from the Calcutta University in Political Science and also in Modern History from Rabindra Bharati University. It has been stated that after obtaining the aforesaid degrees the petitioner in accordance with Rule 33 of the Rules framed by the Calcutta University commenced her studies for LL. B. Course in order to become a practising Ad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.