SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 336

B.C.RAY
BARUN K. SINHA – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, MURSHIDABAD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
A.K.DUTTA, A.K.MUKHERJEE, K.K.Maitra, R.C.DE, S.BANERJEE, S.Gupta, S.MUSTAFI

B. C. RAY, J.

( 1 ) THE subject-matter of challenge in this writ application is the acceptance of the tender submitted by respondent No. 6. Narayan Roy for supply of dietary articles in the hospitals of the Murshidabad District arbitrarily and in violation of the principles of natural justice. The facts of this case as well as the case of Tapan Kumar Ghosh are almost identical and as such the statement of the facts of Barun Kumar Sinha's case will suffice for the purpose of decisions of these two rules.

( 2 ) THE petitioner Barun Kumar Sinha who has been supplying dietary articles in the State-owned hospitals in Murshidabad since 1974 submitted a tender in pursuance of tender notice issued by the Chief Medical Officer of Health. Murshidabad, respondent No. 2, for the year 1981-82 inviting tenders from bona fide contractors for supply of dietary articles. It has been stated in the said notice that the intending tenderers shall quote overall percentage of rate for each category of contract in each zone falling in Fart-I either 'above' or 'at par' or 'below' the schedule of rates prepared for the purpose. It has been further stated in the said notice that in respect of the State-own





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top