SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 243

PRATIBHA BONNERJEA
KRISHNA KISHORE KAR – Appellant
Versus
UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BACHAVAT, BROTIN GHOSH, R.C.DE, RAJAT GHOSH, SUJIT KUMAR SINHA

PRATIBHA BONNERJEA, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a suit for recovery of Rs. 2,26,858. 26 instituted by the plaintiff against the defendants on account of the following facts: It is alleged in the plaint that the plaintiff, in his business of Isis Coal Company, had opened a cash credit account with the defendant bank. In his said business, the plaintiff had dealings and transactions with Durgapur Project Limited, the defendant No. 2 herein, On 2-8-62, the defendant No. 1 at the request of the plaintiff, executed a bond for Rs. 2,00,000/- in favour of the defendant No. 2 guaranteeing payment for coal supplied and to be supplied to the plaintiff by the defendant No. 2. As against this bond, the plaintiff, on 2-8-1962, executed a counter guarantee in favour of the defendant No. 1 on certain terms and conditions contained therein. The period of guarantee was from 2-8-1962 to 1-8-1963 (Ext. A pages 6 and 7 ). In respect of the Bank guarantee the defendant No. 2 had demanded margin money from the plaintiff to cover the said guarantee and pursuant to the same the plaintiff from time to time paid an aggregate sum of Rs. 1,83,500/- which was admitted by the defendant bank by letter dated 4-5-1963 (Ext.




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top