PRATIBHA BONNERJEA
KRISHNA KISHORE KAR – Appellant
Versus
UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is a suit for recovery of Rs. 2,26,858. 26 instituted by the plaintiff against the defendants on account of the following facts: It is alleged in the plaint that the plaintiff, in his business of Isis Coal Company, had opened a cash credit account with the defendant bank. In his said business, the plaintiff had dealings and transactions with Durgapur Project Limited, the defendant No. 2 herein, On 2-8-62, the defendant No. 1 at the request of the plaintiff, executed a bond for Rs. 2,00,000/- in favour of the defendant No. 2 guaranteeing payment for coal supplied and to be supplied to the plaintiff by the defendant No. 2. As against this bond, the plaintiff, on 2-8-1962, executed a counter guarantee in favour of the defendant No. 1 on certain terms and conditions contained therein. The period of guarantee was from 2-8-1962 to 1-8-1963 (Ext. A pages 6 and 7 ). In respect of the Bank guarantee the defendant No. 2 had demanded margin money from the plaintiff to cover the said guarantee and pursuant to the same the plaintiff from time to time paid an aggregate sum of Rs. 1,83,500/- which was admitted by the defendant bank by letter dated 4-5-1963 (Ext.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.