SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 252

PRATIBHA BONNERJEA
ISWAR GOPAL JEW – Appellant
Versus
BHAGWANDAS SHAW – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.C.Roy Chowdhury, P.K.ROY, P.P.MITTER, PRABIR ROY CHAUDHARY

( 1 ) THE above suit was instituted by the plaintiff for eviction of the defendant from the suit property as a trespasser and a decree for Rupees 1,09,600/- by way of mesne profit etc. The plaintiff alleged that pursuant to an agreement for lease by and between the parties. the plaintiff agreed to let out the suit property to the defendant for 86 years on terms and conditions contained in the draft approved lease and the defendant deposited Rupees 1,00,000/- with the plaintiff by way of salami to be forfeited on failure of the defendant to execute the lease. The possession of the suit property was delivered to the defendant pursuant to the said agreement. The defendant failed and neglected to execute the lease. Therefore the said deposit was forfeited by the plaintiff in terms of the agreement and the suit was instituted for recovery of possession. In the written statement the defendant alleged that he was in possession of the suit property as a thika tenant prior to the agreement for lease. It was denied that there was any failure or negligence on the part of the defendant to execute the lease. A cross suit was filed by the defendant against the plaintiff, being Suit No. 2740 of 1






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top