SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 92

P.C.BOROOAH
SHEWBUXRAI ONKARMALL – Appellant
Versus
ASSTT. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANWAR HUSAAIN, P.J.KHAITAN, R.N.BAJORIA

P. C. BOROOAH, J.

( 1 ) IN or about August 1978 the petitioners in these three Rules imported consignments of Soda Ash of light variety from Rumania for their use in their factories for the manufacture of Sodium Silicate. On arrival of the goods at the port of Calcutta, the goods were not immediately cleared for home consumption, but were kept in a bonded warehouse without payment of any duty thereon under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Thereafter parts of the consignments were cleared by the three petitioners on payment of the relevant customs duty chargeable on the relevant date.

( 2 ) ON January 4, 1979 the Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue issued two Notifications under Section 25 of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereinafter 'the Act') exempting Soda Ash of both the light and dense varieties from the payment of certain portion of the Customs Duty and the whole of the auxiliary duty leviable under Sub-section (1) of Section 35 of the Finance Act. Copies of these two Notifications are annexures 'a' and 'b' to the petition in the three cases.

( 3 ) THEREAFTER the petitioners applied to the Customs Authorities for clearance of the balance of the goods from the bonded warehouses










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top