SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 175

SUDHINDRA MOHAN GUHA, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Appellant
Versus
INVEST IMPORT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.L.BHATTACHARJI, S.C.SEN

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) THIS reference under Section 256 (1) of the I. T. Act, 1961, relates to the assessment year 1967-68. Only one question has been referred to this court for answer. The question is as follows :" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the sum of Rs. 13,02,495 represented revenue loss accruing to the assessee during the previous year relevant to the assessment year 1967-68 in consequence of devaluation of the rupee on June 6, 1966?"

( 2 ) THE assessee is a non-resident company having its head office at Belgrade, Yugoslavia, and the relevant assessment year is 1967-68 for which the previous year ended on 31st December, 1966. In the said assessment, the assessee had claimed devaluation loss of Rs. 14,55,970 representing depreciation in the value of the rupee in terms of Yugoslavia dinars on the 6th June, 1966, The amount was calculated with reference to the credit balance of the head office with the Indian branch and represented the difference between dinars and Indian rupee on conversion as on the 5th May, 1966, and the 6th June, 1966. In the assessment, this deduction was considered by the ITO, w
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top