SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 157

P.C.BOROOAH
INDIA FOILS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA (UOI) – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
JATIN GHOSH, N.C.CHAKRAVARTI, Pradip Kumar Guha, S.M.SANYAL

P. C. BOROOAH, J.

( 1 ) INDIA Foils Ltd. the petitioner No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the company carries on business in the manufacture and sale of aluminium foils of diverse varieties including foils known as tea chest linings. These foils are manufactured by the company at its factory at Kamarhati in the District of 24-Parganas.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the Writ petition, tea chest lining foils are bare foils which are not backed by any reinforcing material; after being manufactured these foils are interleaved with duty paid tissue paper to ensure that the edges of the foils do not get stuck in the process of being cut to shape. Neither is the tissue paper used for the purpose of interleaving glued or pasted to the foils with any adhesive.

( 3 ) WHEN the Excise authorities demanded payment of excise duty on the tissue paper used for interleaving the aluminium foils for tea chest linings, the company drew the attention of the said authorities to a Notification bearing No. 155/72, dated 15-6-72, issued by the Central Government in exercise of its powers conferred by Rule 8 (1) of the Central Excise Rules whereby; Central Excise duty on foils of the description 'merely cut to shap







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top