SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Cal) 337

SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE, C.K.BANERJEE
UNITED COMMERCIAL BANK – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
KALYAN ROY, P.L.SHOME, R.N.DUTTA, S.K.Bagchi

SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, J.

( 1 ) IN this reference under Section 256 (1) of the I. T. Act, the following questions have been referred to this court : "1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the disposal of the appeal by the Tribunal was in accordance with law ?

( 2 ) WHETHER, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the order of remand by the Tribunal was legal and valid ?" 2. In order to appreciate these questions it would be proper to refer to the relevant portion of the order of the ITO. The ITO in his order, inter alia, observed as follows : "in the beginning of September, 1971, it was reported in the press that there had been a violation of the foreign exchange regulation by the bank. For instance, the Statesman (Calcutta edition) of 1st September, 1971, contained the following report; mr. R. B. Shah, Custodian, United Commercial Bank of 10, Brabourne Road, Calcutta, was produced in custody on Tuesday, before Mr. H. N. Sen, Chief Presidency Magistrate, Calcutta, after being arrested on the same day by an officer of the Enforcement Directorate, Department of Personnel, Government of India, under Section 19b ( 1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top