SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Cal) 136

GITESH RANJAN BHATTACHARJEE
MALABIKA DHAR – Appellant
Versus
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.K.BANERJI, K.K.MITRA, MANJARI GUPTA, T.K.BANERJEE

GITESH RANJAN BHATTACHARJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE three writ petitioners have filed the present writ petition under Art. 226 for quashing the impugned orders bearing Ref. No. SSA / 95 / 10 / (41) dated the l 5/03/1995 issued in respect of each of the three petitioners by the respondent No. 6, the Head of the Department of Sociology and Social Anthropology, University of North Bengal by which the petitioners who were already admitted to the M. A. Part-I Class of the said University, have been informed that their admission to the said class has been cancelled by the Executive Council in its meeting held on 13/03/1995 in view of the gross violation of the prescribed rules for such admission. The petitioners were accordingly instructed therein not to attend the classes with immediate effect. On receipt of the same the petitioner No. 1 also wrote to the respondent No. 7 on the Very next day, that is, on 16/03/1995 that she did not violate any rule and that she got herself admitted in accordance with the official procedure. In the said letter which is Annexure--E to the writ petition the petitioner also wondered as to what was her fault for which the Executive Council could take a decision to te













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top