SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Cal) 429

BASUDEVA PANIGRAHI
SUNIL KUMAR BASU – Appellant
Versus
DWINJENDRA NATH MITRA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
BHASKAR GHOSH

B. PANIGRAHI, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the reversing Judgment and Decree dated 20. 6. 1978 passed by Subordinate Judge, Alipore in T. A. No. 1029/78 dismissing the plaintiff suit for permanent injunction. The facts leading to this appeal are summarily stated :-

( 2 ) THE plaintiff No. 1 who is the appellant in this case who along with other co-plaintiffs filed the suit for permanent injunction against the defendant No. 1 restraining him from interfering with the construction work of a boundary wall on the eastern end of the common passage described in schedule 'a' to the plaint. Plaintiff No. 1 and the Plaintiff No. 2 whose interest was devolved upon proforma defendants 3 and 4 are the owners of the premises No. 16/c and 16/a situated in Abinash Chandra Banerjee Lane. The other plaintiffs namely, originally numbered as plaintiffs 2 and 4 are the joint owners of the premises No. 16/b, Abinash Chandra Banerjee Lane. The defendant No. 1/respondent is the owner of the premises No. 19/e, Abinash Chandra Banerjee Lane. The plaintiffs claimed that they set apart a passage with a width 6 ft. for their exclusive use which is leading to the Corporation Road, Abinash Chandra











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top