SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Cal) 451

RABIN BHATTACHARYYA
DILIP KUMAR DEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ANIL MUKHERJI

R. BHATTACHARYYA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has initiated the instant writ application for mandamus commanding the respondent to set aside, rescind or withdraw the annexure-J dated 19. 6. 95, certiorari, Rule NISI, injunction and for other consequential reliefs.

( 2 ) THE gravamen of the allegations which generated the initiation of the writ application is that the petitioner was a lawful tenant at Flat No. O/2 Maniktala Govt. Housing Estate, saddled with obligations to fulfill the conditions. The rent, as determined, according to the terms of the tenancy, was for sum of Rs. 235/- payable per month inclusive of occupier's share of taxes and external service charges bereft of payment of electricity charges.

( 3 ) THE petitioner, in due performance of the agreement, continued in possession. With the passage of time, the petitioner applied for withdrawal of joint membership of Iswarchandra Vidyasagar Samabay Niwas Ltd. a different housing at Bagmari which was acceeded to by the respondent opposite parties dated 10. 7. 92.

( 4 ) IN the premises, the petitioner was not armed with any flat in the said Niwas and the provisions of the West Bengal Premises (Tenancy Regulation) Act, 1976 b
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top