SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Cal) 217

ARUN KUMAR DUTTA
ARUN KUMAR SINHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
DEBASIS ROY, MILAN MUKHARJI, PRIYA NATH GHOSH

A. K. DATTA, J.

( 1 ) BY these two Revisional Applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as Code), the Petitioner-accused-Arun Kr. Sinha (hereinafter referred to as petitioner) has prayed the Court for quashing of the two relevant Criminal Proceedings, being case Nos. 13 and 14 of 1987, now pending before the learned Judge, 1st Special Court, 24-Paraganas Alipore, arising out of section "m" Case No. 79 dated 13-3-84, for the reasons stated and on the grounds made out therein.

( 2 ) DURING the hearing, the learned Advocate for the Petitioner, Mr. Milan Mukherjee, had urged only two grounds for quashing of the Proceedings, namely that :1. It was incompetent for the learned Judge to take cognizance of the alleged offence in the absence of Sanction under section 197 of the Code, since the alleged offence had allegedly been committed by the petitioner as a public servant in the discharge of his official duty, and2. On the ground of undue delay in the trial of the aforesaid two relevant cases infringing his right to speedy, trial as enshrined by Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

( 3 ) THE aforesaid case no. 13 of 1987 had bee














Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top