SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Cal) 100

S.B.SINHA
CHINTA HARAN BISWAS – Appellant
Versus
UCO BANK – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASHUTOSH, Gopal Chandra Sen, SUBRATA ROY, UMASANKAR BANERJEE

S. B. SINHA, J.

( 1 ) -THIS writ application is directed against an order of transfer dated 12. 4. 94 as contained in annexure 'b' to the writ application whereby and whereunder tie petitioner has been transferred to Ranipool Branch.

( 2 ) MR. Ashutosh Law, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has raised a number of contentions in support of this writ application. The learned Counsel has drawn my attention to a Circular letter dated 4. 3. 89 as contained in annexure 'c' to the writ application and submitted on the basis thereof that from a perusal of Item No. 63 of List of Branch identified as non-family station it would appears that Ranipool has been treated to be a difficult centre-non-family station. The learned Counsel submits that the respondent Bank having issued a policy decision with regard to the transfer in terms of Circular letter dated 8. 8. 87 as contained in annexure 'i' to the writ application cannot violate its own policy decision. The learned Counsel for the petitioner contends that there are other officers who are willing to go to Ranipool Branch but their cases have not been considered whereas the petitioner has been transferred despite his rep























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top