SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Cal) 158

N.K.BHATTACHARYYA
CHANDER MOHINI KHULLER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF WEST BENGAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.S.Paul, K.J.SENGUPTA, RABI SANKAR CHATTERJI, SUSHANTA BANERJI

N. K. BHATTACHARYYA, J.

( 1 ) -BY this revision one of the accused persons has challenged the proceeding pending in the Court of the learned 10th Judicial Magistrate, 24-Parganas (South) in complaint case No. C-1526 of 1993 T. R. No. 302 of 1993 and also for setting aside the order of taking cognizance and issuance of process against the accused petitioner and otters under Section 120b, 114 and 448 of the Indian Penal Code passed by the said learned Magistrate by his orders dated 7th September, 1993 and order dated 29th January, 1994 respectively and also rejection of the petition of the petitioner under Section 205 of the Cr. Procedure Code. The relevant facts for the disposal of this application are delenated hereunder : (A)in his petition of complaint the complaint/opposite party No. 2, herein, inter alia, alleged that he is an employee and a representative of "new Road Nyas" a public charitable trust located at Premises No. 1a, Lal Behari Shah Sarani, Calcutta within the jurisdiction of Alipore Police Station. (b)it has further been alleged that the present accused/petitioner was the lessee in respect of the 1st floor of premises No. 1a, Lal Behari Shah Sarani formerly known a
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top