SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Cal) 179

RABIN BHATTACHARYYA
PANCHANAN KARMAKAR – Appellant
Versus
ANANDAMOY KARMAKAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
PIUSH KANTI KHARA, PUSPENDU BIKASH SAHU, SUDHAKAR BISWAS

R. BHATTACHARYYA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Civil revision is directed against Order, No. 13 dated 29. 5. 91 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Midnapore in Civil Revision No. 58 of 1990. The revision preferred before the learned Court below erupted from an order passed by the learned Munsiff 3rd Court Midnapore in Title Suit No. 57 of 1990 where the learned Munsiff by his Order No. 39 dated 31. 5. 90 allowed a petition for local investigation of the suit property on the strength of an application preferred by the defendants or the opposite parties which has now become the all sore in the lis.

( 2 ) THE learned Court of revision of first instance in exercise if his power under section 115a of the Code of Civil Procedure of 1908 struck down the order of the learned Munsiff when this revision before this Court challenging the propriety and legality of the order impugned.

( 3 ) WITHOUT entering into unnecessary details, the matter can be disposed of only on the legal premises.

( 4 ) IN revision, factual determination of the case is impermissible and only in the rarest of rare cases, the fact can be brought into play provided the application of mind of the Court is not adhered to
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top