SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(Cal) 389

S.K.MUKHERJEE, SATYA NARAYAN CHAKRABARTY
ALL INDIA ALLAHABAD BANK OFFICERS ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
SURYA KUMAR GHOSH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
ASOKE BANERJI, DEBASIS ROY, S.DAS GUPTA

S. K. MOOKHERJEE, J.

( 1 ) THE present first Misc. appeal is directed against Order No. 5 dated 26th August, 1994, passed by the learned Judge. VII Bench, City Civil Court, Calcutta, in title suit No. 2490 of 1994, dismissing an application of the plaintiff/appellant under Order 39, Rules 1 and 2 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The injunction prayed for, inter alia, was seeking to restrain the defendants/respondents, their men, agents etc. from taking any steps or giving any effect to or holding any election as per the notice dated 15th July, 1994. The said notice dated 15th July, 1994, in substance purported to initiate an election process in terms of the general body decision, dated 16th April, 1994, for certain posts in the appellant's Association.

( 2 ) THE plaintiff/appellant filed the instant suit, inter alia, praying for declaration that the said notice was illegal, arbitrary, void and bad in law; that the appointment of defendant No. 1, who issued the said notice as Election Commissioner was illegal, void and liable to be cancelled, for permanent injunction seeking to restrain the defendants and their men and agents from taking any steps and/or giving






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top