SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1994 Supreme(Cal) 136

A.K.SENGUPTA, S.K.SEN
STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STEEL CRACKERS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.C.Bhattacharya, S.PAL CHAUDHARY

S. K. SEN, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment of the learned single Judge directing the respondent to desist from auctioning the goods which are subject matter of the sale order dared 6th September, 1989 end 28th July, 1989 being annexure 'b' to the writ petition without first effecting the delivery of the contracted quality and quantity of goads to the writ petitioners in terms of the sale orders dated 28th July, 1989 and plant instruction Memo dated 6th September, 1989 at a price stipulated in the last published price list of the respondent authority.

( 2 ) IN the writ petition the respondents/writ petitioners challenged the with-holding of delivery of rejected Steel Rolls and C. I. Rolls as wrongful end illegal.

( 3 ) THE facts involve in this appeal inter alia as appears from the writ petition are that the respondent No. 1/writ petitioner No. 1 is a partnership four and the respondent No. 2/writ petitioner No. 2 is a partner of the firm. They carry on business of Cast Iron processing and Steel Processing at Ghusuri, Howrah.

( 4 ) ON 28th July, 1989 Metal Scrap Trade Corporation Limited (the respondent MSTC) issued a Sale Order in favour of the respondents





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top